JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 16, 2014

A- de 2014

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Iván Palacio Palacio

✓Claimant Maria De Jesus Cuenca Sornoza·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Corte Constitucional
  • Competencia excepcional para promover cumplimiento de sus sentencias y dar trámite a incidente de desacato
Tramite De Cumplimiento Fallo De Tutela E Incidente De Desacato
  • Solicitud simultánea o sucesiva por beneficiario
Accion De Tutela En Materia De Pension De Vejez
  • No asumir competencia excepcional para cumplimiento de sentencia T-890/11
Cumplimiento Fallo De Tutela E Incidente De Desacato
  • Diferencias
  • Competencia del juez de primera instancia
4 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de cumplimiento de la sentencia T-890/11.

La memorialista solicita que la Corporación asuma la competencia excepcional para hacer cumplir la providencia de la referencia, debido al incumplimiento de la demandante.

Luego de analizar la petición formulada por la actora, la Sala de Revisión decide no asumir la competencia excepcional solicitada.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Quinta de Revision de la Corte Constitucional
  2. RESUELVE
  3. No asumir la competencia excepcional para el cumplimiento de la Sentencia T-890 de 2011, formulada por la senora Maria de Jesus Cuenca Sornoza.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.